Hanging out on the internet

former kansan in dc. 40% tech, 15% books, 300% dog photos.
Posts tagged "journalism"

pewresearch:

See Pew Research President Alan Murray’s presentation on “Journalism in the Digital Age” at George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs.

PS: You can also follow our president, @alansmurray, on Twitter.

pewresearch:

The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism sends out a briefing email every morning, highlighting the biggest changes and news in the industry. 

For example, in today’s news: Howard Kurtz and The Daily Beast part ways, Al Jazeera announces plans for a Detroit bureau, Facebook releases “best practices” guide for journalists and Michael Bloomberg may be interested in buying The Financial Times.

Sign up to receive it here so you’ll always know what’s going on.

Sign up | Past daily briefings

pewresearch:

Four Revenue Success Stories in Newspapers — What’s working? How are they doing it? Can they help save the industry?

Check out the tactics and strategy used by these innovative editors and publishers in our infographic.

Read the full report here

(via pewinternet)

brianlucid:

A free, open source reference book on the emerging field of data journalism. 

An international, collaborative effort involving dozens of data journalism’s leading advocates and best practitioners - including from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, the BBC, the Chicago Tribune, Deutsche Welle, the Guardian, the Financial Times, Helsingin Sanomat, La Nacion, the New York Times, ProPublica, the Washington Post, the Texas Tribune, Verdens Gang, Wales Online, Zeit Online and many others.

(via lifeandcode)

One of the things I tell reporters every day is: When you get to that point of the story, four or five paragraphs in, and [you write] ‘the move comes amid…’ — stop.

Tim Grieve, top editor of Politico Pro, to Nieman Journalism Lab.

He continued: “Anybody who is reading Politico Pro knows what ‘the move comes amid.’ That 300 words of new essential information can be a 300-word story. The traditional approach would be a 1,000-word story, but the second part of that story would be the blah blah blah that everybody already knows…It’s very liberating for reporters, but it’s pretty damn liberating for readers too. No one has time to read stuff they already know. Take your time with the stuff that’s going to grab them by the jacket lapels and say, ‘Whoa, this is new.’”

I’m wondering if stories like Mike Daisey’s mark a shift in this conversation about attention. The conversation has involved web publishers, advertisers and activists all asking how we compete successfully for small slices of attention. With stories like Daisey’s and Kony 2012, the conversation switches from the practical question of seizing attention to the ethical questions of attention. What’s fair play in demanding attention for a story or for a cause? How far can you simplify a story to gain attention? How much can you speak on someone else’s behalf? Perhaps the reason these conversations get so passionate is that they’re not just about the rules of different professions but about the basic question, “What can someone demand I pay attention to?
What the article threshold creates is an odd hybrid — a mass market for advertising, but a niche market for users. This is the commercial equivalent of the National Public Radio model, where sponsors reach all listeners, but direct support only comes from donors. (Lest NPR seem like small ball, it’s worth noting that the Times ‘ has convinced something like one out of every hundred of its online readers to pay, while NPR affiliates’ success rate is something like one in twelve. Newspapers with thresholds now aspire to NPR’s persuasiveness.)

—Clay Shirky, Newspapers, Paywalls, and Core Users

Slowly catching up on my “to-read” list of articles. (Clay Shirky’s essays are always on that list.)

serendipity Kindle Single future of narrative awesome but what’s the business model Gutenberg parenthesis gamification aggregation right-sizing semipermeable This Week in Review shoot a photo rubber cement, Gardening & War section we will make them pay Dan Fleckner future circulation Clay Shirky reporting advertising we will make them pay 5% corruption. I love the Weather & Opera section digital circulation strategy abundance Storify collaboration Walter Lippmann advertising Aron Pilhofer blog crowdsourcing Chartbeat future of context, WikiLeaks shoot a video Google News Paul Steiger RSS Lucius Nieman Instagram Jay Rosen discuss the other longer Book Review Robin Sloan news.me, recontextualize horse-race coverage link economy hot news doctrine got drudged Jeff Jarvis CPM Demand Media morgue the medium is the message.

The original story of Times New Roman’s genesis goes like this: Morison wrote a blistering article in 1929 arguing that Times Old Roman, the font of The Times of London, was dated, clunky, badly printed and in need of help — his help. The paper listened and charged Morison with directing the creation of a new suite of letters. He did, and on Oct. 3, 1943, Times New Roman debuted on the bright white broadsheets of the London daily.

Here’s the problem with this tidy account: Evidence found in 1987 — drawings for letters and corresponding brass plates — suggests that the real father of the font wasn’t a typographer at all, but a wooden boat designer from Boston named William Starling Burgess.